Exhibits
Exhibits
Every exhibit makes one point, states it in one sentence and carries its source line. The exhibits below use illustrative data.
Research report
The controls that prevent a fatality
Exhibit 1 Illustrative data
In this illustrative group, one site’s field verification fell sharply while the others held steady
Planned critical-control verifications completed in the field, five illustrative sites, 2024 and 2025, percent
SourceIllustrative data for design purposes only. Not a research finding and not to be quoted.
NoteValues are placeholders chosen to demonstrate the exhibit format. They describe no real sites.
Appears inThe controls that prevent a fatality
Data behind this exhibit
In this illustrative group, one site’s field verification fell sharply while the others held steady (Planned critical-control verifications completed in the field, five illustrative sites, 2024 and 2025, percent) Item Value Site A 2024: 74%; 2025: 72% Site B 2024: 70%; 2025: 46% Site C 2024: 62%; 2025: 65% Site D 2024: 58%; 2025: 60% Site E 2024: 52%; 2025: 55% Cite this exhibit
Before the Incident, “In this illustrative group, one site’s field verification fell sharply while the others held steady,” Exhibit 1, in “The controls that prevent a fatality” (2026). Illustrative data; not a research finding and not to be quoted. Link
Exhibit 3 Illustrative data
In this illustrative site, a recordable rate of 0.8 sits beside 41 percent field verification
Three measures for one illustrative site, end of 2025
- 0.8 Recordable injury rate Per 200,000 hours worked, one site, 2025
- 41% Critical-control verifications done in the field Share of those planned, Q4 2025
- 14 Overdue energy-isolation verifications Count at the end of Q4 2025
SourceIllustrative data for design purposes only. Not a research finding and not to be quoted.
NoteValues are placeholders chosen to demonstrate the key-figure format. They describe no real site.
Appears inThe controls that prevent a fatality
Data behind this exhibit
In this illustrative site, a recordable rate of 0.8 sits beside 41 percent field verification (Three measures for one illustrative site, end of 2025) Item Value Recordable injury rate (Per 200,000 hours worked, one site, 2025) 0.8 Critical-control verifications done in the field (Share of those planned, Q4 2025) 41% Overdue energy-isolation verifications (Count at the end of Q4 2025) 14 Cite this exhibit
Before the Incident, “In this illustrative site, a recordable rate of 0.8 sits beside 41 percent field verification,” Exhibit 3, in “The controls that prevent a fatality” (2026). Illustrative data; not a research finding and not to be quoted. Link
Diagram 1 Conceptual
A serious event is prevented by controls on both sides of it; one degraded control can be enough to open a path
Bow-tie model: threats on the left, consequences on the right, the hazardous event at the center
Source: Conceptual diagram for design purposes only. Not a research finding; does not depict a real site or event.
Briefing
A green safety indicator should open a conversation
Exhibit 1 Illustrative data
In this illustrative review, most high-potential events had a precursor already on record
Where the earliest precursor was recorded, illustrative sample of high-potential events, count
SourceIllustrative data for design purposes only. Not a research finding and not to be quoted.
NoteValues are placeholders chosen to demonstrate the exhibit format. They describe no real events.
Appears inA green safety indicator should open a conversation
Data behind this exhibit
In this illustrative review, most high-potential events had a precursor already on record (Where the earliest precursor was recorded, illustrative sample of high-potential events, count) Item Value Near-miss report 11 Maintenance backlog 8 Permit deviation 6 Audit finding 4 No prior record 3 Cite this exhibit
Before the Incident, “In this illustrative review, most high-potential events had a precursor already on record,” Exhibit 1, in “A green safety indicator should open a conversation” (2026). Illustrative data; not a research finding and not to be quoted. Link
Briefing
Event reviews should describe conditions and controls
Exhibit 1 Illustrative data
In this illustrative sample, nearly half of event reviews stopped at an individual action
Last cause recorded in each review, illustrative sample of 30 event reviews, count
SourceIllustrative data for design purposes only. Not a research finding and not to be quoted.
NoteValues are placeholders chosen to demonstrate the exhibit format. They describe no real reviews.
Appears inEvent reviews should describe conditions and controls
Data behind this exhibit
In this illustrative sample, nearly half of event reviews stopped at an individual action (Last cause recorded in each review, illustrative sample of 30 event reviews, count) Item Value Individual action 14 Equipment condition 6 Procedure gap 5 Critical control not verified 3 Planning and scheduling 2 Cite this exhibit
Before the Incident, “In this illustrative sample, nearly half of event reviews stopped at an individual action,” Exhibit 1, in “Event reviews should describe conditions and controls” (2026). Illustrative data; not a research finding and not to be quoted. Link
Briefing
What a critical control verification should record
Exhibit 1 Illustrative data
In this illustrative site, energy isolation carries the most overdue control verifications
Overdue critical-control verifications by control, one site, one quarter, count
SourceIllustrative data for design purposes only. Not a research finding and not to be quoted.
NoteValues are placeholders chosen to demonstrate the exhibit format. They describe no real site.
Appears inWhat a critical control verification should record
Data behind this exhibit
In this illustrative site, energy isolation carries the most overdue control verifications (Overdue critical-control verifications by control, one site, one quarter, count) Item Value Energy isolation 14 Work at height 9 Confined space entry 6 Lifting operations 5 Line breaking 3 Cite this exhibit
Before the Incident, “In this illustrative site, energy isolation carries the most overdue control verifications,” Exhibit 1, in “What a critical control verification should record” (2026). Illustrative data; not a research finding and not to be quoted. Link
Exhibit 2 Illustrative data
In this illustrative site, only energy isolation shows a steady fall in completed verifications
Planned critical-control verifications completed, four controls, one site, by quarter of 2025, percent
SourceIllustrative data for design purposes only. Not a research finding and not to be quoted.
NoteValues are placeholders chosen to demonstrate the small-multiples format. All panels share one axis.
Appears inWhat a critical control verification should record
Data behind this exhibit
In this illustrative site, only energy isolation shows a steady fall in completed verifications (Planned critical-control verifications completed, four controls, one site, by quarter of 2025, percent) Item Value Energy isolation: Q1 88% Energy isolation: Q2 80% Energy isolation: Q3 71% Energy isolation: Q4 62% Work at height: Q1 90% Work at height: Q2 89% Work at height: Q3 91% Work at height: Q4 90% Confined space entry: Q1 85% Confined space entry: Q2 86% Confined space entry: Q3 84% Confined space entry: Q4 87% Lifting operations: Q1 92% Lifting operations: Q2 90% Lifting operations: Q3 93% Lifting operations: Q4 91% Cite this exhibit
Before the Incident, “In this illustrative site, only energy isolation shows a steady fall in completed verifications,” Exhibit 2, in “What a critical control verification should record” (2026). Illustrative data; not a research finding and not to be quoted. Link